< PREVIOUS PAGE

B. How accountable are our financial managers?

Strong sense of accountability to voters by elected officials
Arlington is seen as having a tradition of responsible, public service by its elected officials.
This sense of accountability is seen as extending beyond elections, and into a frame of mind.

Specific comments:
Elected leaders feel and act accountable
Elected officials accountable to voters
Appointed positions may attract more qualified person, but less accountable

Limited oversight of financial operations by appointing bodies or electorate
Oversight exists more in theory than in practice in Arlington.
Understanding financial operations and their results requires experience and time.

Specific comments:
While much is done in public view, public has little insight into financial operations
Shallow organization is visible, prevents collusion
Low visibility elected positions may not be held accountable through elective process
Assessor office not visible
Selectmen do not supervise Comptroller effectively
Selectmen cannot effectively oversee Comptroller
No effective oversight of data processing
Manager provides effective oversight of his own departments
Non-Manager departments lack oversight and have uneven record in financial management

Need autonomy or independence for key finance functions
There is a perceived need by most but not all people interviewed to maintain some autonomy for accounting functions to assure the integrity of reporting, and prevent financial mismanagement.
A structural oversight role is important for proper financial management.  A minority believes that this is unnecessary.

Specific comments:
Appointed finance officials need independence
Comptroller must have some protection
Comptroller needs a separate line of authority
Independent comptroller more important than independent treasurer
Ability to speak with independent voice is key for finance position
Running an open system with meaningful reviews is sufficient guard against mismanagement.



Combined positions of Comptroller and Data Processing management are problematic
There is a perception that this combination was made for convenience, but results in suboptimal performance.

Specific comments:
The rather large data processing budget in the Comptrollers office may be conflict of interest
Comptroller and DP functions should be decoupled; DP position compromises comptroller function
Manager needs more closely connected IT position

C. Do we support coordinated financial decision-making and action?

Officials in finance positions act independently, promoting integrity through checks and balances
Arlington's decentralized financial structure focuses attention on checks and balances. This structure succeeds at reducing the risk of inappropriate action.

Specific comments:
Manager, Treasurer and Comptroller are involved with every expenditure - provides oversight
Current structure has constructive tension

NEXT PAGE >